On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Peter Alban wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 10:01 PM, Justin Graf
> wrote:
>>
>> Peter Alban wrote:
>>
>> duration: 2533.734 ms statement:
>>
>> SELECT news.url_text,news.title, comments.name, comments.createdate,
>> comments.user_id, comments.comment FROM ne
Message from mailto:peter.alb...@gmail.com Peter Alban
peter.alb...@gmail.com at 06-21-2009 10:59:49 PM --
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 10:01 PM, Justin Graf mailto:jus...@emproshunts.com
wrote:
Peter Alban wrote:
duration: 2533.734 ms statement:
Lim
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Peter Alban wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is the query :
> duration: 2533.734 ms statement:
SNIP
> Limit (cost=4313.54..4313.55 rows=3 width=595) (actual
> time=288.525..288.528 rows=3 loops=1)
According to this query plan, your query is taking up 288
milliseconds.
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 10:01 PM, Justin Graf wrote:
> Peter Alban wrote:
>
> *duration: 2533.734 ms statement: *
>
> *SELECT news.url_text,news.title, comments.name, comments.createdate,
> comments.user_id, comments.comment FROM news, comments WHERE comments.cid=
> news.id AND comments.publishe
Message from mailto:gryz...@gmail.com Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz
gryz...@gmail.com at 06-21-2009 09:36:01 PM --
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Justin grafjus...@emproshunts.com wrote:
work_mem = 51024 # min 64, size in KB
Thats allot memory dedicated to work mem if you have 30 connections
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Justin Graf wrote:
> work_mem = 51024 # min 64, size in KB
>
> Thats allot memory dedicated to work mem if you have 30 connections open
> this could eat up 1.5gigs pushing the data out of cache.
I thought work memory is max memory that can be
Peter Alban wrote:
duration: 2533.734 ms statement:
SELECT news.url_text,news.title, http://comments.name comments.name,
comments.createdate, comments.user_id, comments.comment FROM news, comments
WHERE comments.cid=http://news.id news.id AND comments.published='1' GROUP BY
news.url_tex
Hi,
Here is the query :
*duration: 2533.734 ms statement: *
*SELECT news.url_text,news.title, comments.name, comments.createdate,
comments.user_id, comments.comment FROM news, comments WHERE comments.cid=
news.id AND comments.published='1' GROUP BY news.url_text,news.title
comments.name, comme
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 6:54 AM, Peter Alban wrote:
> Should PG realize that if the table data is same should the query result set
> also be the same ?
No. That's not so easy to implement as you might think. Saving the
results of each previous query in case someone issues the same query
again wi
With out knowing how much memory for each of those settings and how much
work_mem for each connection its kinda hard to tell what is going.
Also need version for PG, OS, how big the tables are, Also would be nice to see
the query itself with explain and analyze
PG does not cache the results f
Hey folks !
Still kind of analyzing the situation , I realized that I do have a
reasonably high shared_memory and effective_cache_size , though if the same
query is being run in a number of times ~100-200 concurrent connection it is
not being cached .
Should PG realize that if the table data is
11 matches
Mail list logo