Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Kris Jurka wrote:
As a note for non-JDBC users, the JDBC driver's batch interface allows
executing multiple statements in a single network roundtrip. This is
something you can't get in libpq, so beware of this for comparison's sake..
Re
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Kris Jurka wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
>
>> Out of curiosity I did some tests through JDBC.
>>
>> Using a single-column (integer) table, re-using a prepared statement took
>> about 7 seconds to insert 10 rows with JDBC's batch inte
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Scott Carey wrote:
>
>
> On 4/11/09 11:44 AM, "Mark Wong" wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Greg Smith wrote:
>>> On Fri, 10 Apr 2009, Scott Carey wrote:
>>>
FIO with profiles such as the below samples are easy to set up
>>>
>>> There are some mo
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Mark Wong wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Greg Smith wrote:
>> On Fri, 10 Apr 2009, Scott Carey wrote:
>>
>>> FIO with profiles such as the below samples are easy to set up
>>
>> There are some more sample FIO profiles with results from various
>> file
Kris Jurka wrote on 26.04.2009 19:07:
Despite the size of the batch passed to the JDBC driver, the driver
breaks it up into internal sub-batch sizes of 256 to send to the
server. It does this to avoid network deadlocks from sending too much
data to the server without reading any in return. If
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
Out of curiosity I did some tests through JDBC.
Using a single-column (integer) table, re-using a prepared statement
took about 7 seconds to insert 10 rows with JDBC's batch interface
and a batch size of 1000
As a note for non-JDBC users,
