Re: [PERFORM] Postgres 8.x on Windows Server in production

2009-04-12 Thread Scott Marlowe
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Rainer Mager wrote: > We're running 8.3, but when we started this server about 2 years ago it was > an earlier 8.x, I don't remember which. Cool. PostgreSQL is one of the few projects where I've always recommended upgrading and keeping on the latest major version

Re: [PERFORM] Postgres 8.x on Windows Server in production

2009-04-12 Thread Rainer Mager
We're running 8.3, but when we started this server about 2 years ago it was an earlier 8.x, I don't remember which. --Rainer > -Original Message- > From: pgsql-performance-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-performance- > ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Scott Marlowe > Sent: Monday, Ap

Re: [PERFORM] Postgres 8.x on Windows Server in production

2009-04-12 Thread Scott Marlowe
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Rainer Mager wrote: > We use Postgres 8.x in production on Windows Server 2003. We have not done a > direct head-to-head comparison against any *nix environment, so I can't > really compare them, but I can still give a few comments. Just wondering, what version ar

Re: [PERFORM] Postgres 8.x on Windows Server in production

2009-04-12 Thread Rainer Mager
We use Postgres 8.x in production on Windows Server 2003. We have not done a direct head-to-head comparison against any *nix environment, so I can't really compare them, but I can still give a few comments. First of all, it seems that some of the popular file systems in *nix are more robust at pre