Mark Wong wrote:
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Gregory S. Youngblood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I recently ran some tests on Ubuntu Hardy Server (Linux) comparing JFS, XFS,
and ZFS+FUSE. It was all 32-bit and on old hardware, plus I only used
bonnie++, so the numbers are really only usefu
> From: Mark Kirkwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Mark Wong wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Gregory S. Youngblood
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I recently ran some tests on Ubuntu Hardy Server (Linux) comparing
> JFS, XFS,
> >> and ZFS+FUSE. It was all 32-bit and on old hardware
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 4:54 AM, Mark Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi
> We've thrown together some results from simple i/o tests on Linux
> comparing various file systems, hardware and software raid with a
> little bit of volume management:
>
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/HP_ProLi
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Gregory S. Youngblood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I recently ran some tests on Ubuntu Hardy Server (Linux) comparing JFS, XFS,
> and ZFS+FUSE. It was all 32-bit and on old hardware, plus I only used
> bonnie++, so the numbers are really only useful for my hardware
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 10:04 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Aug 2008, Mark Wong wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We've thrown together some results from simple i/o tests on Linux
>> comparing various file systems, hardware and software raid with a
>> little bit of volume management:
>>
>> htt
I recently ran some tests on Ubuntu Hardy Server (Linux) comparing JFS, XFS,
and ZFS+FUSE. It was all 32-bit and on old hardware, plus I only used
bonnie++, so the numbers are really only useful for my hardware.
What parameters were used to create the XFS partition in these tests? And,
what optio
