Re: [PERFORM] Quad Xeon or Quad Opteron?

2008-05-24 Thread Jeffrey Baker
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 3:41 AM, Andrzej Zawadzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > We're planning new production server for PostgreSQL and I'm wondering > which processor (or even platform) will be better: Quad Xeon or Quad > Opteron (for example SUN now has a new offer Sun Fire X4440 x64)

Re: [PERFORM] I/O on select count(*)

2008-05-24 Thread Decibel!
On May 18, 2008, at 1:28 AM, Greg Smith wrote: I just collected all the good internals information included in this thread and popped it onto http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/ Hint_Bits where I'll continue to hack away at the text until it's readable. Thanks to everyone who answered my questi

Re: [PERFORM] I/O on select count(*)

2008-05-24 Thread Decibel!
On May 18, 2008, at 1:28 AM, Greg Smith wrote: I just collected all the good internals information included in this thread and popped it onto http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/ Hint_Bits where I'll continue to hack away at the text until it's readable. Thanks to everyone who answered my questi

Re: [PERFORM] Posible planner improvement?

2008-05-24 Thread Decibel!
Moving to -hackers... On May 21, 2008, at 9:09 AM, Richard Huxton wrote: Luke Lonergan wrote: The problem is that the implied join predicate is not being propagated. This is definitely a planner deficiency. IIRC only equality conditions are propagated and gt, lt, between aren't. I seem to

Re: [PERFORM] shared_buffers performance

2008-05-24 Thread Decibel!
On Apr 14, 2008, at 3:31 PM, Tom Lane wrote: Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: The transition domain where performance drops dramatically as the database starts to not fit in shared buffers but does still fit in filesystem cache. It looks to me like the knee comes where the DB no lo

Re: [PERFORM] Creating large database of MD5 hash values

2008-05-24 Thread Decibel!
On Apr 11, 2008, at 10:25 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: Sorry, yes, I'm behind on email... :( If MD5 values will be your primary data and you'll be storing millions of them, it would be wise to create your own datatype and operators with the most compact and efficient representation possible.

Re: [PERFORM] Quad Xeon or Quad Opteron?

2008-05-24 Thread Andrzej Zawadzki
Knight, Doug wrote: > Hi, > As a gauge, we recently purchased several servers as our systems get > close to going operational. We bought Dell 2900s, with the cheapest quad > core processors (dual) and put most of the expense into lots of drives > (8 15K 146GB SAS drives in a RAID 10 set), and the P

Re: [PERFORM] Quad Xeon or Quad Opteron?

2008-05-24 Thread Andrzej Zawadzki
Craig Ringer wrote: > Andrzej Zawadzki wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> We're planning new production server for PostgreSQL and I'm wondering >> which processor (or even platform) will be better: Quad Xeon or Quad >> Opteron (for example SUN now has a new offer Sun Fire X4440 x64). >> > > [snip] >