Re: [PERFORM] upgraded to pgsql 8.2.4, getting worse performance then 7.4.x

2007-06-03 Thread Tom Lane
Douglas J Hunley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Saturday 02 June 2007 11:25:11 Tom Lane wrote: >> Another thing that seems strange is that the 8.2 config file does not >> seem to have been processed by initdb --- or did you explicitly comment >> out the settings it made? > I don't understand thi

Re: [PERFORM] upgraded to pgsql 8.2.4, getting worse performance then 7.4.x

2007-06-03 Thread Greg Smith
On Sun, 3 Jun 2007, Douglas J Hunley wrote: commit_delay = 2 commit_siblings = 3 Those are based on a thread their (non-pgsql) DBA found online. I'm perfectly willing to discount him if so advised. Those likely came indirectly from the otherwise useful recommendations at http://www.w

Re: [PERFORM] upgraded to pgsql 8.2.4, getting worse performance then 7.4.x

2007-06-03 Thread Luke Lonergan
When you initdb, a config file is edited from the template by initdb to reflect your machine config. - Luke Msg is shrt cuz m on ma treo -Original Message- From: Douglas J Hunley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2007 02:30 PM Eastern Standard Time To: Tom Lane C

Re: [PERFORM] upgraded to pgsql 8.2.4, getting worse performance then 7.4.x

2007-06-03 Thread Douglas J Hunley
On Saturday 02 June 2007 11:25:11 Tom Lane wrote: > Another thing that seems strange is that the 8.2 config file does not > seem to have been processed by initdb --- or did you explicitly comment > out the settings it made? I don't understand this comment. You are saying 'initdb' will make changes

Re: [PERFORM] upgraded to pgsql 8.2.4, getting worse performance then 7.4.x

2007-06-03 Thread Douglas J Hunley
On Saturday 02 June 2007 11:21:41 Michael Fuhr wrote: > After the restore, did you ANALYZE the entire database to update > the planner's statistics? Have you enabled autovacuum or are you > otherwise vacuuming and analyzing regularly? What kind of queries > are slower than desired? If you post a