On Feb 25, 2007, at 04:39 , Carlos Moreno wrote:
I do have the option to configure it in RAID-0, but I'm sort of
reluctant; I think
there's the possibility that having two filesystems that can be
accessed truly
simultaneously can be more beneficial. The question is: does
PostgreSQL
have
Carlos Moreno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The question is: does PostgreSQL have separate, independent areas that
> require storage such that performance would be noticeably boosted if
> the multiple storage operations could be done simultaneously?
The standard advice in this area is to put pg_xl
Say that I have a dual-core processor (AMD64), with, say, 2GB of memory
to run PostgreSQL 8.2.3 on Fedora Core X.
I have the option to put two hard disks (SATA2, most likely); I'm
wondering
what would be the optimal configuration from the point of view of
performance.
I do have the option
Geoffrey wrote:
> Guillaume Smet wrote:
>> On 2/23/07, Geoffrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> As I've heard. We're headed for 8 as soon as possible, but until we get
>>> our code ready, we're on 7.4.16.
>>
>> You should move to at least 8.1 and possibly 8.2. It's not a good idea
>> to upgrade onl
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 02:04:36AM +0100, Guillaume Smet wrote:
> Could you post EXPLAIN ANALYZE for both queries (after 2 or 3 runs)?
GIST version, short:
amarok=# explain analyze select count(*) from tags where title % 'foo';
QUERY PLAN
