[ cc list limited to -performance ]
Derek Buttineau|Compu-SOLVE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> It seems to me a merge join might be more appropriate here than a
>> nestloop.
After some experimentation, I don't seem to be able to get the planner
to generate a mergejoin based on a backwards index s
A-
> On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 02:39:11PM -0700, Mischa Sandberg wrote:
> > IBM, Sun and HP have their fairly pricey Opteron systems.
>
> We've had some quite good experiences with the HP boxes. They're not
> cheap, it's true, but boy are they sweet.
Question, though: is HP still using their propr
Jona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> anyway, here's the info for relpages:
> Live Server: 424
> Test Server: 338
I was asking about the indexes associated with the table, not the table
itself.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)--
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 02:39:11PM -0700, Mischa Sandberg wrote:
> IBM, Sun and HP have their fairly pricey Opteron systems.
We've had some quite good experiences with the HP boxes. They're not
cheap, it's true, but boy are they sweet.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the future t
Wouldn't the VACUUM have made them equivalent??
anyway, here's the info for relpages:
Live Server: 424
Test Server: 338
Please note though that there're more rows on the live server than on
the test server due to recent upload.
Total Row counts are as follows:
Live Server: 12597
Test Server:
