On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 11:35:22AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The \timing psql command gives different time for the same query executed
> repeatedly.
Why do you believe that the same query will always take the same time
to execute?
A
--
Andrew Sullivan 204-41
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The \timing psql command gives different time for the same query executed
> repeatedly.
That's probably because executing the query repeatedly results in
different execution times, as one would expect. \timing returns the
"exact" query response time, nevertheless.
-N
The \timing psql command gives different time for the same query executed
repeatedly.
So, how can we know the exact response time for any query?
Thanks and Regards,
Radha
> On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 09:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> How do we measure the response time in postgresql?
>
> In additio
About a year ago I programmed a php/firebird application, and I've never had a problem with firebird. It's a small database (a few megabytes), but it just works day after day.
I've seen firebird has updatable views, they seem to work very well.
I have the feeling that It's not as flexible as
Paul Ganainm wrote:
Does Interbase/Firebird have (as far as people here are concerned) any
show-stoppers in terms of functionality which they do have on
PostgreSQL? Or, indeed, the other way round?
Personally I think native windows port is plus that interbase/firebird has over
postgresql. It als
Hi all,
I have just started with PostgreSQL on Linux and in the past I've done a
good bit of work on Interbase (both on Windows and Linux).
What I want to know here is
What do people here think of Interbase/Firebird?
Has anybody done performance metrics or could they point me to a
compa
