I'm very new to Postgresql, so don't beat me up to bad if you see a problem,
just inform me what I've done wrong.
I'm use Postgresql 7.2 (PeerDirect's Windows port) on Win2000 384MB RAM 10GB
of Free space 800 Mhz, using the ODBC driver 7.03.01.00.
I have a table that has 103,000 records in it (re
On 25 Aug 2003 at 8:44, Stephan Szabo wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Rhaoni Chiu Pereira wrote:
>
> > Hi List,
> >
> > As I said before, I'm not a DBA " yet" , but I'm learning ... and I
> > already have a PostgreSQL running, so I have to ask some help...
> > I got a SQL as folows :
>
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Rhaoni Chiu Pereira wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> As I said before, I'm not a DBA " yet" , but I'm learning ... and I
> already have a PostgreSQL running, so I have to ask some help...
> I got a SQL as folows :
...
Looking at the explain:
It's choosing lots of nested loo
2003-08-25 ragyogó napján scott.marlowe ezt üzente:
> On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> > Also another test I'd really like to see is hardware raid (Adaptec, LSI)
> > against Linux software raid, and 5-disk RAID 5 against 4-disk RAID 1+0.
>
> It would be nice to cross those, so you have
scott.marlowe wrote:
On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, Josh Berkus wrote:
Also another test I'd really like to see is hardware raid (Adaptec, LSI)
against Linux software raid, and 5-disk RAID 5 against 4-disk RAID 1+0.
It would be nice to cross those, so you have RAID5 sw vs RAID5 hw, vs
RAID1+0 sw vs RAID1+
On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Also another test I'd really like to see is hardware raid (Adaptec, LSI)
> against Linux software raid, and 5-disk RAID 5 against 4-disk RAID 1+0.
It would be nice to cross those, so you have RAID5 sw vs RAID5 hw, vs
RAID1+0 sw vs RAID1+0 hw.
Now if on
Hi List,
I have posted a subjetc on the admin list but I thought that it might fit
better on this list as follow:
Hi List,
As I said before, I'm not a DBA " yet" , but I'm learning ... and I
already have a PostgreSQL running, so I have to ask some help...
I got a SQL as folows
