Re: max_wal_senders

2023-02-08 Thread Andres Freund
Hi, On 2023-02-09 06:59:53 +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote: > On Wed, 2023-02-08 at 18:07 -0500, Rick Otten wrote: > > I've been thinking about the max_wal_senders parameter lately and wondering > > if there > > is any harm in setting it too high. > > No, there isn

Re: max_wal_senders

2023-02-08 Thread Laurenz Albe
On Wed, 2023-02-08 at 18:07 -0500, Rick Otten wrote: > I've been thinking about the max_wal_senders parameter lately and wondering > if there > is any harm in setting it too high. No, there isn't, except that if you end up having too many *actual* WAL senders, it will cause

max_wal_senders

2023-02-08 Thread Rick Otten
I've been thinking about the max_wal_senders parameter lately and wondering if there is any harm in setting it too high. I'm wondering if I should try to shave a few senders off, perhaps to match my logical replicas + 1, instead of just leaving it at the default of 10. Or vice-versa, c