On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 2:11 PM Levi Aul wrote:
> I have a “temporal table” — a table where there are multiple “versions” of
> entities, with each version having a distinct timestamp:
> CREATE TABLE contract_balance_updates (
> block_id bigint NOT NULL,
> block_signed_at timestamp(0) witho
On Wed, 4 May 2022 at 06:11, Levi Aul wrote:
> It is our expectation that this query “should” be able to be cheap-to-compute
> and effectively instantaneous. (It’s clear to us how we would make it so,
> given a simple LMDB-like sorted key-value store: prefix-match on
> holder_address; take the