'but then I don't have accurate statistics on my toasted table..
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019, 3:39 PM Alvaro Herrera On 2019-Feb-14, Mariel Cherkassky wrote:
>
> > I meant the anaylze, if anaylze will run very often on the original
> table,
> > arent there disadvantages for it ?
>
> It'll waste time and
On 2019-Feb-14, Mariel Cherkassky wrote:
> I meant the anaylze, if anaylze will run very often on the original table,
> arent there disadvantages for it ?
It'll waste time and resources pointlessly. Don't do it -- it won't do
any good.
--
Álvaro Herrerahttps://www.2ndQuadrant.
I meant the anaylze, if anaylze will run very often on the original table,
arent there disadvantages for it ?
בתאריך יום ד׳, 13 בפבר׳ 2019 ב-18:54 מאת Alvaro Herrera <
alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com>:
> On 2019-Feb-13, Mariel Cherkassky wrote:
>
> > To be honest, it isnt my db, but I just have
On 2019-Feb-13, Mariel Cherkassky wrote:
> To be honest, it isnt my db, but I just have access to it ...
Well, I suggest you forget the password then :-)
> Either way, so I need to change the vacuum_Analyze_scale/threshold for the
> original table ? But the value will be too high/low for the ori
To be honest, it isnt my db, but I just have access to it ...
Either way, so I need to change the vacuum_Analyze_scale/threshold for the
original table ? But the value will be too high/low for the original table.
For example if my original table has 30,000 rows and my toasted has
100,000,000 rows.
On 2019-Feb-13, Mariel Cherkassky wrote:
> Hey,
> I have a very big toasted table in my db(9.2.5).
Six years of bugfixes missing there ... you need to think about an
update.
> Autovacuum doesnt gather
> statistics on it because the analyze_scale/threshold are default and as a
> result autoanalyz
