Justin thank you very much for your answer, as you can also see the number of
rows differs a lot
I attach the complete explain, do not attach it because it is large
"HashAggregate (cost=12640757.46..12713163.46 rows=385 width=720) (actual
time=1971962.023..1971962.155 rows=306 loops=1)"
" Output
Dear I have a question to ask you
I am having a slow problem with a query and I am seeing with the explain
that the current cost and time differ by 4 times
Postgres version 9.5.16 in centos 7.6
To try to solve this run the statistics to the table and the same problem
remains
It's a very big table 2
thank you very much justin, i am seeing install the product you recommended
me!
--
Sent from:
https://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-performance-f2050081.html
thank you very much jeff I'll see with the team that manages the operating
system to see if they can help me with this data that you have given me
--
Sent from:
https://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-performance-f2050081.html
Excuse me, can you tell me how can I achieve this?
"The question is how that compared to database size, and size of the
active set (fraction of the database accessed by the application /
queries)."
--
Sent from:
https://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-performance-f2050081.html
Hi Tomas, restart the statistics and take 24-hour samples to see if you can
help me
24 gb server memory 6 gb sharred buffers
# select now,
# pg_size_pretty(buffers_checkpoint*8192)AS buffers_checkpoint,
# pg_size_pretty(buffers_clean*8192)AS buffers_clean,
# pg_size_pretty(buffers_backend*8192)
Thanks a lot, always helping
I attached a snapshot that I take every 12 hours of the pg_stat_bgwriter
select now,buffers_checkpoint,buffers_clean, buffers_backend from
pg_stat_bgwriter_snapshot;
now | buffers_checkpoint | buffers_clean |
buffers_backend
Dear I would like to share with you to see what you think about the
statistics of pg_stat_bgwriter
postgres = # select * from pg_stat_bgwriter;
checkpoints_timed | checkpoints_req | checkpoint_write_time |
checkpoint_sync_time | buffers_checkpoint | buffers_clean | maxwritten_clean
| buffers_back
Would it be nice to start changing those values found in the default
postgres.conf so low?
--
Sent from:
http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-performance-f2050081.html
I was seeing thanks to your recommendations and I found the following, to
see what you think
cache hit rate 0.99637443599712620769
We have the default values 5 minutes
total checkpoint minutes beetween checkpoint
26927 0.358545045634493
temp_files temp_si
With several views, Jeff is following us
Tomorrow I will see if I can provide more data to see if you can guide me a
bit
Thank you so much everyone
--
Sent from:
http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-performance-f2050081.html
thank you very much Tomas, tomorrow at work I will see to capture plans of
ejcucion to see if you can give me a hand, I am really helping me a lot with
their advice
--
Sent from:
http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-performance-f2050081.html
jeff thank you very much for your time, I tell you, they are the same queries
with the same parameters, I take 3 minutes for example, but I execute it and
it takes me seconds, that's why I suspect it is the shared buffer
The server had 16 GB and we increased it to 24, but I really do not know if
it
The rest of the memory Andreas, 16 gb
--
Sent from:
http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-performance-f2050081.html
Dear some consultation, I have a base of about 750 GB in size and we are
having problem of slowness in certain views of the application, so I have
been seeing it is apparently a memory problem because if I run again the
view runs fast, the base is in a virtual server with 24 GB of RAM and 8 GB
of
15 matches
Mail list logo