On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 3:33 PM Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 03:37:57PM -0400, Arjun Ranade wrote:
> > Yes, that join is concerning (red text below). The conditions all need
> to
> > be checked so they are independent.
>
> You can play with the join con
s 178 rows
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 2:52 PM Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 01:08:05PM -0400, Arjun Ranade wrote:
> > When I look at the EXPLAIN ANALYZE output, it seems that it's using a
> > drastically different query plan for the INSERT+SELECT than SELE
timization. I wonder if there is a class or book these
details better.
Anyway, thank you so much for pointing me in the right direction.
Best,
Arjun
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 1:21 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> Arjun Ranade writes:
> > I have a strange performance situation that I cannot resolve
e would be much appreciated.
Thanks,
Arjun Ranade