Jerry Brenner writes:
> I don't have any background with the randomized search. Does the repeated
> pattern with the same plan being executed multiple times in a time range
> and then the plan changes, never to change back, match the expectation with
> the randomization?
[ shrug... ] Insufficie
Thanks for the quick response!
I don't have any background with the randomized search. Does the repeated
pattern with the same plan being executed multiple times in a time range
and then the plan changes, never to change back, match the expectation with
the randomization?
Thanks,
Jerry
On Thu, J
Jerry Brenner writes:
> We are on Postgres 15.5 (Aurora) and capturing query plans via
> auto_explain. We are seeing a large number of query plans for 2 queries
> that have 12 tables. Every fast (or "fast enough") plan has a left deep
> tree and every slow plan has a bushy tree. Is there a way
On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 18:11 Jerry Brenner wrote:
> We are on Postgres 15.5 (Aurora) and capturing query plans via
> auto_explain. We are seeing a large number of query plans for 2 queries
> that have 12 tables. Every fast (or "fast enough") plan has a left deep
> tree and every slow plan has
We are on Postgres 15.5 (Aurora) and capturing query plans via
auto_explain. We are seeing a large number of query plans for 2 queries
that have 12 tables. Every fast (or "fast enough") plan has a left deep
tree and every slow plan has a bushy tree. Is there a way to determine if
a plan was gen
