What a nice catch!
Sent from my iPad
On Aug 10, 2019, at 6:05 AM, Thomas Rosenstein
wrote:
>> [ re-adding list ]
>>
>> "Thomas Rosenstein" writes:
On 9 Aug 2019, at 0:45, Tom Lane wrote:
However ... it sort of looks like the planner didn't even consider
the second plan shape i
[ re-adding list ]
"Thomas Rosenstein" writes:
On 9 Aug 2019, at 0:45, Tom Lane wrote:
However ... it sort of looks like the planner didn't even consider
the second plan shape in the "wrong" case. If it had, then even
if it costed it 3X more than it did in the "right" case, the second
plan wo
