On 2018-12-08 15:23:19 -0800, Rob Sargent wrote:
>
>
> > On Dec 8, 2018, at 3:12 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> >
> > On 2018-12-08 12:06:23 -0800, Jeremy Schneider wrote:
> >> On RDS PostgreSQL, the default is 25% of your server memory. This seems
> >> to be pretty widely accepted as a good starti
> On Dec 8, 2018, at 3:12 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>
> On 2018-12-08 12:06:23 -0800, Jeremy Schneider wrote:
>> On RDS PostgreSQL, the default is 25% of your server memory. This seems
>> to be pretty widely accepted as a good starting point on PostgreSQL.
>
> FWIW, I think it's widely cited,
On 2018-12-08 12:06:23 -0800, Jeremy Schneider wrote:
> On RDS PostgreSQL, the default is 25% of your server memory. This seems
> to be pretty widely accepted as a good starting point on PostgreSQL.
FWIW, I think it's widely cited, but also bad advice. 25% for a OLTP
workload on a 1TB machine wit
Aurora doesn’t use a typical file system so the RAM usually reserved for the OS
file system bufffer cache is instead used for shared_buffers.
We run multiple Aurora/ PG instances and they work quite well. There are
limitations in superuser private, so be aware of that, but generally speaking
This question is probably more of a fit for the performance list, sorry
for the cross post
Forwarded Message
Subject: amazon aroura config - seriously overcommited defaults? (May
be Off Topic)
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2018 12:00:33 -0700
From: Square Bob
To: pgsql-gene...
