padusuma writes:
> Hello Tim,
>
> I have tried the suggestions provided to the best of my knowledge, but I did
> not see any improvement in the INSERT performance for temporary tables. The
> Linux host on which PostgreSQL database is installed has 32 GB RAM.
> Following are current settings I h
In API function may invoke 10 queries. Ideally, I would like to know what
queries are invoked by it and how long each took.
I’m using pg_stat_statement. I can see the API function statement, but how do I
deterministically identify all queries invoked by it?
Thank you
Hi,
On 2018-09-13 14:12:02 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > This is an Aurora cluster running on r4.2xlarge (8 vCPU, 61g).
>
> Don't know much about Aurora, but I wonder whether you paid for
> guaranteed (provisioned) IOPS, and if so what service level.
Given that aurora uses direct-io and has the sto
Just checked metrics while the count was running …
Read latency < 3.5 ms
Write latency < 4 ms
Read throughput ~ 40 MB/sec with sporadic peaks at 100
Read IOPS ~ 5000
QDepth < 3
Thank you
From: Tom Lane
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2018 2:12 PM
To: Fd Habash
Cc: pgsql-performan
Fd Habash writes:
> Based on my research in the forums and Google , it is described in multiple
> places that ‘select count(*)’ is expected to be slow in Postgres because of
> the MVCC controls imposed upon the query leading a table scan. Also, the
> elapsed time increase linearly with table si
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 01:33:54PM -0400, Fd Habash wrote:
> Is this ET expected? If not, what could be slowing it down? I’m currently
> running explain analyze and I’ll share the final output when done.
explain(analyze,BUFFERS) is what's probably interesting
You're getting an index-only-scan,
Based on my research in the forums and Google , it is described in multiple
places that ‘select count(*)’ is expected to be slow in Postgres because of the
MVCC controls imposed upon the query leading a table scan. Also, the elapsed
time increase linearly with table size.
However, I do not kno
Hello Tim,
I have tried the suggestions provided to the best of my knowledge, but I did
not see any improvement in the INSERT performance for temporary tables. The
Linux host on which PostgreSQL database is installed has 32 GB RAM.
Following are current settings I have in postgresql.conf file:
sha