t; > promotion to increase the number of non-submitter reviewers?
> >
> > a) yes
> > b) no
> > c) yes, but submitters and committers should get it too
>
I was going to go with b until I saw the suggestion for a PgCon ticket. I
really like that idea.
gabrielle
LSTATE of 02000.
I thought that Pg always generated an appropriate SQLSTATE code, and that
it was just up to $client code to pick up that value, but that doesn't seem
to be the case. Is this part of the SQL standard we don't implement?
Thanks!
gabrielle
of
transaction block" messages.
> I would like multiple -c commands also, as well as a mix of -f and -c.
> Can we add that at the same time please?
I'll leave this one for someone else to answer. :)
gabrielle
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.o
s like with this patch that's far from being the case.
Correct. Each is handled individually.
Should I continue to check on ON_ERROR_ROLLBACK results, or bounce
this back to the author?
gabrielle
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your s
This review was compiled from a PDXPUG group review (Dan Colish, Mark
Wong, Brent Dombrowski, and Gabrielle Roth).
--
We all agree this is a really useful feature. The patch applies
cleanly to the current git master with git apply, it's in context
diff, and does what it's suppose
x. :)
> Here is version 3 of the patch.
Looks good, and performs as advertised. Thanks!
gabrielle
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Webb Sprague wrote:
>> Hi Josh et al,
>>
>> I believe we are all still interested (Selena? Gabrielle?)
Heck yes!
>> How about this: 6:00 Tuesday evening (Pacific), the three of us (an
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Gabrielle of PDXPUG volunteered that PUG to hold a "code sprint" in
> coordination with a commitfest sometime soon. For that event, the PDXPUG
> members would take on a dozen or so patches, compile and review them and
&
view:
* looks good to me
* fits in with the surrounding code
* no compiler warnings, no crashes
* complete & understandable docs
Personally, I think this rocks. It really improves the readability of
query output.
gabrielle
--
on behalf of the PDXPUG Patch Review Team (Dan, Ma
(cc'ing Webb Sprague because I believe this was actually his
idea...don't want to take credit for it if so. :) )
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Gabrielle of PDXPUG volunteered that PUG to hold a "code sprint" in
> coordination with a commitfes
10 matches
Mail list logo
