Re: [HACKERS] Script to compute random page cost

2002-09-09 Thread Nick Fankhauser
Bruce- With the change in the script that I mentioned to you off-list (which I believe just pointed it at our "real world" data), I got the following results with 6 successive runs on each of our two development platforms: (We're running PGSQL 7.2.1 on Debian Linux 2.4) System 1: 1.2 GHz Athlon

Re: [HACKERS] Script to compute random page cost

2002-09-09 Thread Nick Fankhauser
< 1. I can't see anything obviously wrong with the script, but something very odd is going. -Nick > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Nick Fankhauser > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:25 AM > To: Bruce Momjian;

Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL JDBC and sub-select

2002-11-10 Thread Nick Fankhauser
> > You could set up query logging in the backend and see what the offending > > query is. It may still be something you did (a missing or extra > > something somewhere). > > > How ? These settings have worked for me in a similar situation: (pulled from the admin list archives) My goal was to g

Re: [HACKERS] [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?

2003-11-19 Thread Nick Fankhauser
> > > Least interesting to many user perhaps, but lost of them > > seen to think > > > that it's important for expanding our userbase: > > > http://www.postgresql.org/survey.php?View=1&SurveyID=9 > > That does not say that better entertainment will attract new > > viewers, just that the existing v