st it locally and produce a patch for
that file, but I'm not confident on integrating it, making git patchs
or going further, so I would like to know if doing that would be
enough and then I can give the code to someone to review or integrate
it.
Waiting for orientation.
Francisco Olarte
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 11:44 PM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Francisco Olarte
>> What messages are you seeing, exactly? "auto-deadlocking" isn't a thing.
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/57EBC9AE.2060302
sts, paralell + serial, and loop on them.
This could be used on a first approach to split on !pg_catalog +
pg_catalog and used as a base for having and explicit list or some
flag in the catalog later.
Francisco Olarte.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To m
Robert:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Francisco Olarte
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Alvaro Herrera
>>> wrote:
>> ...
>>&g
On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 9:12 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 10:16 PM, Alvaro Herrera
>> wrote:
>>> Robert Haas wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Francisco Olarte
>
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 4:51 AM, Jim Nasby wrote:
> On 10/5/16 9:58 AM, Francisco Olarte wrote:
>> Is the system catalog a bottleneck for people who has real use for
>> paralell vacuum? I mean, to me someone who does this must have a very
>> big db on a big iron. If tha
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 10:59 PM, Francisco Olarte
> wrote:
>> For me -f & -j is not perfect, but better than not having it. It can
>> deadlock when given certain sets of catalog tables, either by making
>> i
;XYZ\0" in this case ). It is not that difficult as
strings have a global order, the next string to any one is always that
plus the \0, or whatever your minimum is.
The problem is with anything similar to a real number, but then there
I've always opted for half-open interval, as they can cover the l
the benefits of not having people unintentionally make
non-contiguous date/timestamp intervals, which I periodically suffer.
Francisco Olarte.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
gs, and some others are easier with them is enough for allowing
them as an explicit non default for me.
Francisco Olarte.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
not having replicated data after
commit, so, why bother with synchronous replication in the first
place?
Francisco Olarte.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
11 matches
Mail list logo
