ction of an aggregate that is to be operated on by a final function
>written in sql or any of the pl-languages?
Thanks
Dave Byrne
NOTICE: This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
addressee and may contain confidential, proprietary and/or privileged
information. If y
's and recognized them
as temp tables with oid2name.
Dave Byrne
Phone: (310) 526-5000
Direct: (310) 526-5021
Email: dby...@mdb.com<mailto:dby...@mdb.com>
MDB CAPITAL GROUP LLC
Seeing Value Others Do Not, Creating Value Others Can Not.
401 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1020
Santa Monic
be added.
Thanks
Dave Byrne
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:t...@sss.pgh.pa.us]
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 12:29 PM
To: Dave Byrne
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Bruce Momjian
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Possible Bug in pg_upgrade
Dave Byrne writes:
> Beginning
On 08/11/2011 12:02 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On ons, 2011-08-10 at 18:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Dave Byrne writes:
Attached is a patch that skips orphaned temporary relations in pg_upgrade if they
are lingering around. It works for 9.0 -> 9.1 upgrades, however I wasn't able
to t
dn't exist before 9.1,
my feeling is that it's a blocker.
regards, tom lane
I can confirm that the bug in pg_upgrade has been fixed with Bruce's patch
in commit 2411fbdac448045a23eebf4f0dbfd5790ebad720
Thanks
Dave Byrne
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing lis
