Re: [HACKERS] Change authentication error message (patch)

2014-01-23 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian writes: > I have developed the attached patch to fix this problem. Do I need to > say "invalid user or invalid or expired password"? I'm not convinced that this improves anything. The problem might not in fact be either of the things you mention, in which case the new message is

Re: [HACKERS] [bug fix] pg_ctl always uses the same event source

2014-01-23 Thread Amit Kapila
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 2:38 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Amit Kapila wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> Amit Kapila writes: On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 9:03 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > So? Anything which can know the value of a GUC par

Re: [HACKERS] Why do we let autovacuum give up?

2014-01-23 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Craig Ringer escribió: > On 01/24/2014 11:32 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > > The hard part of this is that shutting down autovacuum during heavy > > load may be exactly the wrong thing to do. > > Yep. In fact, it may be appropriate to limit or stop autovacuum's work > on some big tables, while pushing it

Re: [HACKERS] Postgresql for cygwin - 3rd

2014-01-23 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian writes: > Andrew, should this configuration/code patch be applied to 9.4? > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/51b59794.3000...@gmail.com > I think we would have to make Cygwin-specific regression output to > handle the regression failures, but frankly I am not even sure if

Re: [HACKERS] Postgresql for cygwin - 3rd

2014-01-23 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:48:01PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > Andrew, should this configuration/code patch be applied to 9.4? > > > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/51b59794.3000...@gmail.com > > > I think we would have to make Cygwin-specific regression output to

Re: [HACKERS] Change authentication error message (patch)

2014-01-23 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:39:34PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > I have developed the attached patch to fix this problem. Do I need to > > say "invalid user or invalid or expired password"? > > I'm not convinced that this improves anything. The problem might not in > fact b

Re: [HACKERS] Postgresql for cygwin - 3rd

2014-01-23 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 01/23/2014 10:50 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:48:01PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: Bruce Momjian writes: Andrew, should this configuration/code patch be applied to 9.4? http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/51b59794.3000...@gmail.com I think we would have to make Cy

Re: [HACKERS] Why do we let autovacuum give up?

2014-01-23 Thread Claudio Freire
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Craig Ringer wrote: > On 01/24/2014 11:32 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Alvaro Herrera writes: >>> Claudio Freire escribió: If you ask me, I'd like autovac to know when not to run (or rather wait a bit, not forever), perhaps by checking load factors or some >>

Re: [HACKERS] [bug fix] pg_ctl always uses the same event source

2014-01-23 Thread Amit Kapila
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 4:22 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > "MauMau" writes: >> From: "Tom Lane" >>> I'm still not clear on why we can't just use the port number. > >> To use port, we have to tell the location of $PGDATA to regsvr32.exe. > > [ scratches head... ] Exactly which of the other proposals *do

Re: [HACKERS] ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe

2014-01-23 Thread Peter Geoghegan
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:57 AM, Simon Riggs wrote: > v15 to fix the above problem. Minor quibble: I get a compiler warning with the patch applied. "relcache.c: In function ‘RememberToFreeTupleDescAtEOX’: relcache.c:2317:3: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code [-Werror=declaration

Re: [HACKERS] Postgresql for cygwin - 3rd

2014-01-23 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 24/01/2014 05:28, Andrew Dunstan wrote: On 01/23/2014 10:50 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:48:01PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: Bruce Momjian writes: Andrew, should this configuration/code patch be applied to 9.4? http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/51b59794.3000...@gm

Re: [HACKERS] GIN improvements part2: fast scan

2014-01-23 Thread Alexander Korotkov
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 6:48 AM, Tomas Vondra wrote: > I plan to do more thorough testing over the weekend, but I'd like to > make sure I understand what to expect. My understanding is that this > patch should: > > - give the same results as the current code (e.g. the fulltext should > not retu

Re: [HACKERS] extension_control_path

2014-01-23 Thread Sergey Muraviov
Hi. I can't apply the patch. $ git apply --stat ~/Downloads/extension_control_path.v0.patch fatal: unrecognized input 2014/1/14 Dimitri Fontaine > Hi, > > Please find attached to this email a patch implementing a new GUC that > allows users to setup a list of path where PostgreSQL will search

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP)

2014-01-23 Thread Dean Rasheed
On 22 January 2014 09:54, David Rowley wrote: > I've performed some more benchmarks on this patch tonight. The results and > full recreation scripts are attached along with the patch it was tested > against. > I noticed that the rate of changes to this patch has dropped off, which I took as sign

<    1   2