Re: [HACKERS] Synchronous Log Shipping Replication

2008-09-08 Thread ITAGAKI Takahiro
"Fujii Masao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 3) Patch of introducing new background process which I've called > WALSender. It takes charge of sending WAL to the slave. > > Now, I assume that WALSender also listens the connection from > the slave, i.e. only one sender process manages

Re: [HACKERS] Common Table Expressions (WITH RECURSIVE) patch

2008-09-08 Thread Jeff Davis
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 13:45 +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote: > Thanks for the review. > > > The standard specifies that non-recursive WITH should be evaluated > > once. > > What shall we do? I don't think there's a easy way to fix this. Maybe > we should not allow WITH clause without RECURISVE? My

<    1   2