"Fujii Masao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 3) Patch of introducing new background process which I've called
> WALSender. It takes charge of sending WAL to the slave.
>
> Now, I assume that WALSender also listens the connection from
> the slave, i.e. only one sender process manages
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 13:45 +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> Thanks for the review.
>
> > The standard specifies that non-recursive WITH should be evaluated
> > once.
>
> What shall we do? I don't think there's a easy way to fix this. Maybe
> we should not allow WITH clause without RECURISVE?
My
101 - 102 of 102 matches
Mail list logo