On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 05:56:03PM +0200, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> As some of you already know, I have been working on multiple postmaster
> + RPM issue for some time. We are approaching 8.2.0, and I still could
> not complete this.
>
> Also, I'm having problems with my eyes which pre
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 01:27:26AM -0800, Paul Lindner wrote:
> My solution was to create RPMs with the version number embedded in the
> name. Thus for 7.4.13 and 8.1.5 I have:
>
> postgres7.4-13-1_fc6.x86_64.rpm
> postgres8.1-5-1_fc6.x86_64.rpm
>
> Everything goes into /usr/local/pg7.4 and
[moving to -hackers]
I wrote:
I have made some progress with what I think is needed to have two
interpreters for plperl. This is a lot harder than the pltcl case for
two reasons: 1. there are no restrictions on having 2 tcl
interpreters, and 2. tcl does not need to save and restore contex
On Friday 10 November 2006 08:53, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 12:32 +0100, Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD wrote:
> > 4. although at first it might seem so I see no advantage for vacuum with
> > overflow
>
> No need to VACUUM the indexes, which is the most expensive part. The
> more index
Hi...
i'm using debian sarge and when trying to compile 8.2beta3 got this fail...
gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline
-Wendif-labels -fno-strict-aliasing -g -Wno-error
-L../../../../src/port -Wl,-rpath,'/usr/local/pgsql/pgsql/lib'
preproc.o type.o ecpg.o ecpg_keywords.o
Hi,
On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 01:27 -0800, Paul Lindner wrote:
> Everything goes into /usr/local/pg7.4 and /usr/local/pg8.1, init
> scripts are /etc/init.d/postgres8.1, /etc/init.d/postgres7.4
/usr/local is not the right place for a database server, per Linux FSH.
> spec file(s) available on request
> i'm using debian sarge and when trying to compile 8.2beta3 got this fail...
Just checked: no problems here on a stock 3.1.
What ./configure switches did you use?
Bye, Chris.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 02:31:24PM -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> Hi...
>
> i'm using debian sarge and when trying to compile 8.2beta3 got this fail...
> /usr/lib/libc_nonshared.a(elf-init.oS)(.text.__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx+0x0):
> In function `__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx':
> : multiple definition of
On 11/12/06, Chris Mair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i'm using debian sarge and when trying to compile 8.2beta3 got this fail...
Just checked: no problems here on a stock 3.1.
What ./configure switches did you use?
./configure --prefix=/usr/local/pgsql/pgsql
--enable-debug--enable-cassert --e
On 11/12/06, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 02:31:24PM -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> Hi...
>
> i'm using debian sarge and when trying to compile 8.2beta3 got this fail...
> /usr/lib/libc_nonshared.a(elf-init.oS)(.text.__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx+0x0):
> In function `__i686.
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 04:06:03PM -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> >> /usr/lib/libc_nonshared.a(elf-init.oS)(.text.__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx+0x0):
> >> In function `__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx':
> >> : multiple definition of `__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx'
> >I had that error once and it was caused by a dodgy ver
On 11/12/06, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 04:06:03PM -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> >> /usr/lib/libc_nonshared.a(elf-init.oS)(.text.__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx+0x0):
> >> In function `__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx':
> >> : multiple definition of `__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx'
> >I had th
Tom Lane wrote:
Dave Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
This is a server bug, I will post to hackers for you, it has little
to do with JDBC, however the ? can't be a column in a prepared statement
I cannot reproduce any problem using what I think is equivalent in libpq:
I thought we got th
On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 13:01 -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Friday 10 November 2006 08:53, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 12:32 +0100, Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD wrote:
> > > 4. although at first it might seem so I see no advantage for vacuum with
> > > overflow
> >
> > No need to VAC
> > > i'm using debian sarge and when trying to compile 8.2beta3 got this
> > > fail...
> >
> > Just checked: no problems here on a stock 3.1.
> > What ./configure switches did you use?
> >
>
> ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/pgsql/pgsql
> --enable-debug--enable-cassert --enable-depend
>
Again,
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 10:31:17PM +0100, Chris Mair wrote:
> Again, no problem here.
> Some version infos are below.
Ok, here's a long shot: the error involves /usr/lib/libc_nonshared.a
which is supplied by libc6-dev. Does the dev package you have match the
actual C library. (bit hard to see how
On Sunday 12 November 2006 16:23, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 13:01 -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
> > On Friday 10 November 2006 08:53, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 12:32 +0100, Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD wrote:
> > > > 4. although at first it might seem so I see no ad
On Monday 06 November 2006 13:12, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 09:02 +, Dave Page wrote:
> > Neil Conway wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 22:59 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > >> Nothing except initdb should add objects in pg_catalog. AFAICS,
> > >> adminpack doesn't have an
Tom Lane wrote:
> While there's not anything wrong with this proposed patch in itself,
> I have to admit that I don't see the point.
The points are:
1. It is just unpleasant to leave the overflow.
2. It is not easy for users to understand what they should do when they
encounter the error messag
19 matches
Mail list logo
