On Wednesday 22 January 2003 11:49, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 15:34, Curtis Faith wrote:
> > tom lane writes:
> > > You think we should drive away our existing unix developers
> > > in the mere hope of attracting windows developers? Sorry, it
> > > isn't going to happen.
> >
> >
Curtis Faith wrote:
> tom lane writes:
> > You think we should drive away our existing unix developers
> > in the mere hope of attracting windows developers? Sorry, it
> > isn't going to happen.
>
> Tom brings up a good point, that changes to support Windows should not
> add to the tasks of tho
On Wednesday 22 January 2003 20:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Firebird uses a set of Borland command line tools and Borland's make,
> which they give away as a free download. Even if you're compiling for
> Windows, the build process uses Borland's command line "make". A batch
> build script copi
Firebird uses a set of Borland command line tools and Borland's make,
which they give away as a free download. Even if you're compiling for
Windows, the build process uses Borland's command line "make". A batch
build script copies makefiles from a single source directory and spreads
them aro
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 15:34, Curtis Faith wrote:
> tom lane writes:
> > You think we should drive away our existing unix developers
> > in the mere hope of attracting windows developers? Sorry, it
> > isn't going to happen.
>
> Tom brings up a good point, that changes to support Windows should
tom lane writes:
> You think we should drive away our existing unix developers
> in the mere hope of attracting windows developers? Sorry, it
> isn't going to happen.
Tom brings up a good point, that changes to support Windows should not
add to the tasks of those who are doing the bulk of the w
