Applied.
---
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 10:43:29PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 02:43:19PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > >> In any event, I think the documentation should caution that the
> > > >> u
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 02:43:19PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >> In any event, I think the documentation should caution that the
> > >> upgrade should not be deemed to be a success until after a system-wide
> > >> sync has been done. Even if we use the link rather than copy method,
> > >> are
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 09:42:08PM -0800, Jeff Janes wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:11:26PM -0800, Jeff Janes wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Yes, it is with synchronous_commit=off. (or if it wasn't originally,
> >> it is now, with the same resu
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:11:26PM -0800, Jeff Janes wrote:
>
>>
>> Yes, it is with synchronous_commit=off. (or if it wasn't originally,
>> it is now, with the same result)
>>
>> Applying your fsync patch does solve the problem for me on ext
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:11:26PM -0800, Jeff Janes wrote:
[ Sorry for the delay in replying.]
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:29:39AM -0800, Jeff Janes wrote:
> >>
> >> Is turning off synchronous_commit enough? What about turning off fsy
