Re: Review [was Re: [HACKERS] MD5 aggregate]

2013-06-23 Thread Dean Rasheed
On 21 June 2013 21:04, David Fetter wrote: > On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:48:35AM -0700, David Fetter wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:34:52AM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote: >> > On 15 June 2013 10:22, Dean Rasheed wrote: >> > > There seem to be 2 separate directions that this could go, which >> >

Re: Review [was Re: [HACKERS] MD5 aggregate]

2013-06-21 Thread David Fetter
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:48:35AM -0700, David Fetter wrote: > On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:34:52AM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote: > > On 15 June 2013 10:22, Dean Rasheed wrote: > > > There seem to be 2 separate directions that this could go, which > > > really meet different requirements: > > > > > >

Review [was Re: [HACKERS] MD5 aggregate]

2013-06-21 Thread David Fetter
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:34:52AM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote: > On 15 June 2013 10:22, Dean Rasheed wrote: > > There seem to be 2 separate directions that this could go, which > > really meet different requirements: > > > > 1). Produce an unordered sum for SQL to compare 2 tables regardless of > >