Done. Called libpq++.
---
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Oh, sorry. I will do it now.
>
> ---
>
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >
> > We're talking about li
Oh, sorry. I will do it now.
---
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> We're talking about libpq++, not libpqxx :)
>
>
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> >
> > Actually, I think Jeroen T. Vermeulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
We're talking about libpq++, not libpqxx :)
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Actually, I think Jeroen T. Vermeulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> should create the
> project. It is his code, and if he would add me as an admin, that would
> help. I am CC'ing him.
>
>
> -
Actually, I think Jeroen T. Vermeulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> should create the
project. It is his code, and if he would add me as an admin, that would
help. I am CC'ing him.
---
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Aug 2002
On Sun, 18 Aug 2002, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier writes:
>
> > Okay, here is what I'd like to suggest ... Bruce, let's start off really
> > simple ... go create a project for libpq++ (I believe someone even
> > volunteered to maintain it?) and let me know once created, and I'll mov
Marc G. Fournier writes:
> Okay, here is what I'd like to suggest ... Bruce, let's start off really
> simple ... go create a project for libpq++ (I believe someone even
> volunteered to maintain it?) and let me know once created, and I'll move
> the CVS directory over for libpq++ and out of the p
On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> I think the only unknown is whether their CVS's should be moved out of
> >> the main tree.
>
> > Yes, they should be ...
>
> Certainly. I was a bit worried about losing CVS history, but Marc
> indicated he
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I think the only unknown is whether their CVS's should be moved out of
>> the main tree.
> Yes, they should be ...
Certainly. I was a bit worried about losing CVS history, but Marc
indicated he could make the move with history and all, so there'
On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > Chris has made code changes to GBorg to allow for this based on requests
> > from Dave Page (ie. PgAdminII) ... so there is no problems with that ...
> >
> > As for keeping them in our main CVS, the more we put over onto GBor
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> Chris has made code changes to GBorg to allow for this based on requests
> from Dave Page (ie. PgAdminII) ... so there is no problems with that ...
>
> As for keeping them in our main CVS, the more we put over onto GBorg, the
> more it will get used, test, debugged, poun
On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Now, I know one of Marc's goals is to have libpq as a stand-alone
> > tarball, but I thought we decided that this _didn't_ require it to be in
> > a separate CVS repository.
>
> Removing libpq is impossible since
On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> OK, I am ready to do the work, but I would like to get a plan of where
> we are going. I see in interfaces:
>
> cli
> ecpg
> jdbc
> libpgeasy
> libpgtcl
> libpq
> libpq++
> libpqxx
> odbc
> pe
Neil Conway wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Bruce, can you make a project for Pg::DBD?
>
> Erm, has anyone contacted the maintainer of DBD::Pg? Given that Bruce
> doesn't maintain it and AFAIK Jeffrey Baker (the current maintainer)
> and hasn't expressed any dissatisfa
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bruce, can you make a project for Pg::DBD?
Erm, has anyone contacted the maintainer of DBD::Pg? Given that Bruce
doesn't maintain it and AFAIK Jeffrey Baker (the current maintainer)
and hasn't expressed any dissatisfaction with CPAN, I'm not sure w
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now, I know one of Marc's goals is to have libpq as a stand-alone
> tarball, but I thought we decided that this _didn't_ require it to be in
> a separate CVS repository.
Removing libpq is impossible since psql, pg_dump, etc all depend on it.
> I don't
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> > > integrate or remove new libpqxx
> > > integrate or add to gborg Pg:DBD
> > >
> > > Seems like gborg is the place for these.
> >
> > I would volunteer to package libpq++ separately.
>
> Okay, the procedure is simpl
On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > integrate or remove new libpqxx
> > integrate or add to gborg Pg:DBD
> >
> > Seems like gborg is the place for these.
>
> I would volunteer to package libpq++ separately.
Okay, the procedure is simple, but where do we want to put this? Do
17 matches
Mail list logo
