Re: Re[3]: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] A patch for xlog.c

2001-02-27 Thread The Hermit Hacker
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > The Hermit Hacker writes: > > > I don't ... I personally admin FreeBSD and Solaris boxen ... FreeBSD, > > first step is to always recompile the kernel after an install, to get rid > > of crud and add Shared Memory ... the Solaris boxes, you add a cou

Re: Re[3]: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] A patch for xlog.c

2001-02-27 Thread Peter Eisentraut
The Hermit Hacker writes: > I don't ... I personally admin FreeBSD and Solaris boxen ... FreeBSD, > first step is to always recompile the kernel after an install, to get rid > of crud and add Shared Memory ... the Solaris boxes, you add a couple of > lines to /etc/system and reboot, and you have

Re[3]: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] A patch for xlog.c

2001-02-26 Thread The Hermit Hacker
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, jamexu wrote: > Hello The, > > Tuesday, February 27, 2001, 11:00:05 AM, you wrote: > > THH> On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, jamexu wrote: > > >> Hello Tom, > >> > >> Tuesday, February 27, 2001, 12:23:25 AM, you wrote: > >> > >> TL> This looks a lot like exchanging the devil we know (Sys

Re[3]: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] A patch for xlog.c

2001-02-26 Thread jamexu
Hello The, Tuesday, February 27, 2001, 11:00:05 AM, you wrote: THH> On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, jamexu wrote: >> Hello Tom, >> >> Tuesday, February 27, 2001, 12:23:25 AM, you wrote: >> >> TL> This looks a lot like exchanging the devil we know (SysV shmem) for a >> TL> devil we don't know. Do I need t