Re: AW: [HACKERS] v7.0.3 *pre-release* ...

2000-11-07 Thread Tom Lane
The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If its that easy to fix the regress test so that it passes, can we get it > committed and build a new tarball so that ppl doing regression on v7.0.3 > see a clean regress? The way I want to fix it will probably require getting new geometry files for

Re: AW: [HACKERS] v7.0.3 *pre-release* ...

2000-11-07 Thread The Hermit Hacker
If its that easy to fix the regress test so that it passes, can we get it committed and build a new tarball so that ppl doing regression on v7.0.3 see a clean regress? On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Tom Lane wrote: > Pete Forman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The only remaining failure is geometry. The

Re: AW: [HACKERS] v7.0.3 *pre-release* ...

2000-11-07 Thread Tom Lane
Pete Forman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The only remaining failure is geometry. The results I got were nearly > identical to geometry-powerpc-aix4.out. The only differences were the > order of rows returned by three of the tables. I'll submit the > results file to pgsql-patches. Rather than

Re: AW: [HACKERS] v7.0.3 *pre-release* ...

2000-11-07 Thread Pete Forman
Pete Forman writes: > The only remaining failure is geometry. The results I got were > nearly identical to geometry-powerpc-aix4.out. The only > differences were the order of rows returned by three of the tables. > I'll submit the results file to pgsql-patches. I've submitted a one line pat