Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [HACKERS] Development Plans

2005-02-27 Thread Neil Conway
Tom Lane wrote: I wouldn't mind seeing people be a little more vocal on the hackers list about what they plan to be doing, just so that there's not duplication of effort. Stuff I have done in some form that I need to finish up and submit: - GiST improvements: sane memory management, 10% scan perf.

Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [HACKERS] Development Plans

2005-02-25 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce used to try to describe our releases as being oriented towards some > particular goal, but I always thought that these were after-the-fact > descriptions that had nothing to do with the real development process. > The truth is that individual developers work on what they fee

Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [HACKERS] Development Plans

2005-02-25 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
I wouldn't mind seeing people be a little more vocal on the hackers list about what they plan to be doing, just so that there's not duplication of effort. But trying to assemble that into some sort of published Master Plan sounds to me like just a recipe for making ourselves look foolish when the

Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [HACKERS] Development Plans

2005-02-25 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Am Freitag, 25. Februar 2005 16:49 schrieb Bruce Momjian: > I have no idea how to predict what will be in 8.1. I couldn't predict > what would be in 8.0 until just before feature freeze, so the idea that > we would have any clue about 8.1 is unrealistic. A good guess for the features contained in