On Wednesday 22 January 2003 02:01, Dann Corbit wrote:
> Maybe because most of the machines in the world (by a titanic landslide)
> are Windoze boxes.
On the desktop, yes. On the server, no. PostgreSQL is nore intended for a
server, no? I can see the utility in having a development installatio
> -Original Message-
> From: Hans-Jürgen Schönig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 10:54 PM
> To: Brian Bruns; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Win32 port patches submitted
>
>
> Brian Bruns wrote:
>
> >P
Brian Bruns wrote:
Problem is, nobody builds packages on windows anyway. They just all
download the binary a guy (usually literally "one guy") built. So, let's
just make sure that one guy has cygwin loaded on his machine and we'll be
all set.
Correct.
I wonder why we need a Windows port
Problem is, nobody builds packages on windows anyway. They just all
download the binary a guy (usually literally "one guy") built. So, let's
just make sure that one guy has cygwin loaded on his machine and we'll be
all set.
Sorry, couldn't help myself...Seriously, it's a cultural thing, I w
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> "Al Sutton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I would back keeping the windows specific files, and if anything moving the
> > code away from using the UNIX like programs. My reasoning is that the more
> > unix tools you use for compiling, the less likley you are to attract
> > e
"Al Sutton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would back keeping the windows specific files, and if anything moving the
> code away from using the UNIX like programs. My reasoning is that the more
> unix tools you use for compiling, the less likley you are to attract
> existing windows-only develope
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Al Sutton wrote:
> I would back keeping the windows specific files, and if anything moving the
> code away from using the UNIX like programs. My reasoning is that the more
> unix tools you use for compiling, the less likley you are to attract
> existing windows-only develope
I would back keeping the windows specific files, and if anything moving the
code away from using the UNIX like programs. My reasoning is that the more
unix tools you use for compiling, the less likley you are to attract
existing windows-only developers to work on the code. I see the Win32 patch
as
