Re: [PERFORM] [HACKERS] Query in SQL statement

2005-10-04 Thread Jim C. Nasby
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 12:51:08PM -0700, Roger Hand wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jim C. Nasby > > Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 4:49 PM > > Subject: Re: [PERFORM] [HACKERS] Query in S

Re: [PERFORM] [HACKERS] Query in SQL statement

2005-10-02 Thread Roger Hand
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jim C. Nasby > Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 4:49 PM > Subject: Re: [PERFORM] [HACKERS] Query in SQL statement > I suggest ditching the CamelCase and going with underline_seperato

Re: [PERFORM] [HACKERS] Query in SQL statement

2005-10-01 Thread Tom Lane
"Roger Hand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I suggest ditching the CamelCase and going with underline_seperators. >> I'd also not use the bareword id, instead using bad_user_id. And I'd >> name the table bad_user. But that's just me. :) > I converted a db from MS SQL, where tables and fields were