Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I modified pg_regress.c to use just the return code to determine if the
> diff worked, but I added in a WIN32-specific test for the file size. I
> think that is the cleanest solution. Attached.
It really needs a comment, along the lines of
/*
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> The cases that I think we most need to defend against are
>>> (A) diff program not found
> In summary, on MinGW, files differ or 'diff' not found, returns 1. If
> one of the files to be compared does not exist, it returns 2. And of
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I checked on MinGW and system() just returns the value returned by the
> > > application. There isn't any special two-values-in-one layering like is
> > > done on Unix for wait() and the return value from sy
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I checked on MinGW and system() just returns the value returned by the
> > application. There isn't any special two-values-in-one layering like is
> > done on Unix for wait() and the return value from system(). It seems if
> > the ch
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I checked on MinGW and system() just returns the value returned by the
> application. There isn't any special two-values-in-one layering like is
> done on Unix for wait() and the return value from system(). It seems if
> the child dies from a signal, th
