Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?

2005-11-25 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Why don't we have a libedit configure flag? Well, I can code up a configure flag, but that doesn't mean that the thing will compile at the end. :) -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ ---(end of broadcast)--

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to

2005-11-22 Thread Tom Lane
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If we are going to move toward libedit then libedit should be included > in core. We already do support libedit; support does not mean "include", for either readline or libedit. I think it'd be reasonable to provide a configure option to control se

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to

2005-11-22 Thread Joshua D. Drake
Chuck McDevitt wrote: Another vote for libedit support... We at Greenplum definitely want to use it. If we are going to move toward libedit then libedit should be included in core. Otherwise you are creating a dependency on the largest postgresql used OS (linux). The advantage here of cours

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to

2005-11-22 Thread Chuck McDevitt
Another vote for libedit support... We at Greenplum definitely want to use it. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster