Re: [HACKERS] xlogdump behaviour translating dropped relations

2006-07-26 Thread Diogo Biazus
On 7/26/06, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "Diogo Biazus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:> On 7/26/06, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>> I'm not sure it should be making any attempt to translate anything. >> What makes you think the oids even refer to the current database?> I'm getting a new d

Re: [HACKERS] xlogdump behaviour translating dropped relations

2006-07-26 Thread Tom Lane
"Diogo Biazus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 7/26/06, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I'm not sure it should be making any attempt to translate anything. >> What makes you think the oids even refer to the current database? > I'm getting a new database connection based on the dbNode of th

Re: [HACKERS] xlogdump behaviour translating dropped relations

2006-07-26 Thread Diogo Biazus
On 7/26/06, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "Diogo Biazus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:> I'm not sure about how the xlogdump should behave when translating oids of> dropped relations.I'm not sure it should be making any attempt to translate anything. What makes you think the oids even refer to t

Re: [HACKERS] xlogdump behaviour translating dropped relations

2006-07-26 Thread Tom Lane
"Diogo Biazus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm not sure about how the xlogdump should behave when translating oids of > dropped relations. I'm not sure it should be making any attempt to translate anything. What makes you think the oids even refer to the current database?