Chris Browne wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (chinni) writes:
> > Postgres-R is a multi server (write anywhere) replication tool
> > which is possibly important for any enterprise if they want to shift
> > to postgres.
> >
> > Did you guys debate on merging it.
>
> I seem to recall there being a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (chinni) writes:
> Postgres-R is a multi server (write anywhere) replication tool
> which is possibly important for any enterprise if they want to shift
> to postgres.
>
> Did you guys debate on merging it.
I seem to recall there being a licensing issue; Postgres-R uses the
chinni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Did you guys debate on merging it.
Yes.
If it were actually synced with our current CVS and potentially
mergeable, the debate might have been longer :-(. But in point of fact,
postgres-R has never been less than two releases behind in the past five
years, and
See http://www.slony.org/
It's a master-multislave replication system that has a pretty robust
development cycle. It just reached a 1.0 release.
Whether any solution becomes a core part of the distribution remains, I
think, to be seen.
-tfo
On Jul 27, 2004, at 4:03 AM, chinni wrote:
Postg
