On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Masahiko Sawada
> wrote:
>> While reading source codes I found the following comment in xlog.c.
>>
>> /*
>> * Have we passed our safe starting point? Note that minRecoveryPoint is
>> * known to be inco
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> While reading source codes I found the following comment in xlog.c.
>
> /*
> * Have we passed our safe starting point? Note that minRecoveryPoint is
> * known to be incorrectly set if ControlFile->backupEndRequired, until
> * the XLOG_B
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 12:11:19 -0500
> From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: pgsql-hackers list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] what does
--On Monday, January 26, 2004 12:11:19 -0500 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've upgraded my production system to 741 yesterday, and just
discovered this log message: statistic buffer is full.
If you see this a lot, it might be worth increasing PGSTAT_RECVBUFFERSZ
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>> I've upgraded my production system to 741 yesterday, and just discovered
>>> this log message: statistic buffer is full.
>>
>> If you see this a lot, it might be worth increasing PGSTAT_RECVBUFFERSZ.
>
> How much is a lot? it occured ~30 times since 23pm (it's 17:48 p
PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] what does it mean
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > I've upgraded my production system to 741 yesterday, and just discovered
> > this log message: statistic buffer is full.
>
> If you see this a lot, it might be worth increasin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I've upgraded my production system to 741 yesterday, and just discovered
> this log message: statistic buffer is full.
If you see this a lot, it might be worth increasing PGSTAT_RECVBUFFERSZ.
regards, tom lane
---(end of
