Re: [HACKERS] voting to the xslt_process() need

2011-11-07 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan writes: > Please also see earlier discussions of these items in the mailing list. Yes. It's very unlikely that we'll accept a patch that just moves xslt_process into core without doing anything about its definitional and implementation shortcomings. See for instance http://archi

Re: [HACKERS] voting to the xslt_process() need

2011-11-07 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 11/07/2011 12:10 PM, Peter Padua Krauss wrote: I vote to see the contrib/xml2's xslt_process() build-in function (only xslt_process) moved into PostgreSQL core. Database servers can offer some "load balancing" with another CPUs, like a PHP server... I have in mind some main exa