Re: [HACKERS] tsearch2 for 7.3.X

2003-07-22 Thread Oleg Bartunov
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > > I mean, the end user - the person entering the search string on the > website > > > won't know that syntax... > > > > You always could rewrite user query to that syntax. > > That's why I said it would be a cool feature! Saves every web des

Re: [HACKERS] tsearch2 for 7.3.X

2003-07-22 Thread Oleg Bartunov
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > > SELECT intindex, strtopic FROM tblmessages > > > WHERE idxfti @@ 'jam and > > > toast -guitar'::userquery::tsquery; > > > > idxfti @@ 'jam & toast & ! guitar' > > I mean, the end user - the person entering

Re: [HACKERS] tsearch2 for 7.3.X

2003-07-22 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
> > I mean, the end user - the person entering the search string on the website > > won't know that syntax... > > You always could rewrite user query to that syntax. That's why I said it would be a cool feature! Saves every web designer from writing the conversion code for their site - you just p

Re: [HACKERS] tsearch2 for 7.3.X

2003-07-22 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
> > SELECT intindex, strtopic FROM tblmessages > > WHERE idxfti @@ 'jam and > > toast -guitar'::userquery::tsquery; > > idxfti @@ 'jam & toast & ! guitar' I mean, the end user - the person entering the search string on the website won't know that syntax... Chris

Re: [HACKERS] tsearch2 for 7.3.X

2003-07-22 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Oleg Bartunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > OK. I'll suggest people to try new tsearch2 in README file of old > > tsearch. > > Okay, that works for me. Please patch the old tsearch README file in > both HEAD and REL7_3_STABLE branch as soon as possible --- we are going > to wr

Re: [HACKERS] tsearch2 for 7.3.X

2003-07-22 Thread Teodor Sigaev
Patched. Tom Lane wrote: Oleg Bartunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: OK. I'll suggest people to try new tsearch2 in README file of old tsearch. Okay, that works for me. Please patch the old tsearch README file in both HEAD and REL7_3_STABLE branch as soon as possible --- we are going to wrap a 7

Re: [HACKERS] tsearch2 for 7.3.X

2003-07-22 Thread Nigel J. Andrews
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, Tom Lane wrote: > Oleg Bartunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > OK. I'll suggest people to try new tsearch2 in README file of old > > tsearch. > > Okay, that works for me. Please patch the old tsearch README file in > both HEAD and REL7_3_STABLE branch as soon as possible --

Re: [HACKERS] tsearch2 for 7.3.X

2003-07-22 Thread Tom Lane
Oleg Bartunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > OK. I'll suggest people to try new tsearch2 in README file of old > tsearch. Okay, that works for me. Please patch the old tsearch README file in both HEAD and REL7_3_STABLE branch as soon as possible --- we are going to wrap a 7.3.4 release as soon as

Re: [HACKERS] tsearch2 for 7.3.X

2003-07-22 Thread Teodor Sigaev
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: I think it's production quality. Actually, we use it in our projects with 7.3.3. You may read docs on tsearch2 home page http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/postgres/gist/tsearch/V2/ You know what would be an AWESOME feature? The ability to process user queries directly

Re: [HACKERS] tsearch2 for 7.3.X

2003-07-22 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
> I think it's production quality. Actually, we use it in our > projects with 7.3.3. You may read docs on tsearch2 home page > http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/postgres/gist/tsearch/V2/ You know what would be an AWESOME feature? The ability to process user queries directly: eg. SELECT intindex, str

Re: [HACKERS] tsearch2 for 7.3.X

2003-07-21 Thread Oleg Bartunov
OK. I'll suggest people to try new tsearch2 in README file of old tsearch. Oleg On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > We don't normally issue new features in minor releases, but for a > > /contrib, we could consider it. > > I can't see sticki

Re: [HACKERS] tsearch2 for 7.3.X

2003-07-21 Thread Andreas Joseph Krogh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 21 July 2003 23:43, Oleg Bartunov wrote: > On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Monday 21 July 2003 22:46, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > We don't normally issue new fea

Re: [HACKERS] tsearch2 for 7.3.X

2003-07-21 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > We don't normally issue new features in minor releases, but for a > /contrib, we could consider it. I can't see sticking code that hasn't been through any public beta testing into 7.3.4. Not even as contrib material --- how embarrassed would you be if t

Re: [HACKERS] tsearch2 for 7.3.X

2003-07-21 Thread Oleg Bartunov
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Monday 21 July 2003 22:46, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > We don't normally issue new features in minor releases, but for a > > /contrib, we could consider it. > > > > --

Re: [HACKERS] tsearch2 for 7.3.X

2003-07-21 Thread Andreas Joseph Krogh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 21 July 2003 22:46, Bruce Momjian wrote: > We don't normally issue new features in minor releases, but for a > /contrib, we could consider it. > > --- > > Oleg Bartunov w

Re: [HACKERS] tsearch2 for 7.3.X

2003-07-21 Thread Bruce Momjian
We don't normally issue new features in minor releases, but for a /contrib, we could consider it. --- Oleg Bartunov wrote: > Hi there, > > seems we'll have 7.3.4 release. Is't worth to submit new tsearch2 > module for this