Re: [HACKERS] tolower() identifier downcasing versus multibyte encodings

2011-09-05 Thread Bruce Momjian
Did we ever address this? --- Tom Lane wrote: > I've been able to reproduce the behavior described here: > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2011-03/msg00538.php > It's specific to UTF8 locales on Mac OS X. I'm n

Re: [HACKERS] tolower() identifier downcasing versus multibyte encodings

2011-03-21 Thread Francisco Figueiredo Jr.
I just received a feedback from our bug report about this problem and it seems the problem also occurred on a windows machine. http://pgfoundry.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1010988&group_id=1000140&atid=590 On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 14:13, Marko Kreen wrote: > On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 5:

Re: [HACKERS] tolower() identifier downcasing versus multibyte encodings

2011-03-19 Thread Marko Kreen
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Marko Kreen writes: >> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 6:10 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> Or we could bite the bullet and start using str_tolower(), but the >>> performance implications of that are unpleasant; not to mention that >>> we really don't want to r

Re: [HACKERS] tolower() identifier downcasing versus multibyte encodings

2011-03-19 Thread Tom Lane
Marko Kreen writes: > On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 6:10 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Or we could bite the bullet and start using str_tolower(), but the >> performance implications of that are unpleasant; not to mention that >> we really don't want to re-introduce the "Turkish problem" with >> unexpected han

Re: [HACKERS] tolower() identifier downcasing versus multibyte encodings

2011-03-19 Thread Marko Kreen
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 6:10 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Or we could bite the bullet and start using str_tolower(), but the > performance implications of that are unpleasant; not to mention that > we really don't want to re-introduce the "Turkish problem" with > unexpected handling of i/I in identifiers