Re: [HACKERS] size of .po changesets

2012-08-23 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 11:21 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Yeah, IMHO .po files are handled pretty badly by SCMs. By SCMs that store diffs internally, perhaps, but Git doesn't, so I don't think it matters much for storage whether .po files diff well. > I wonder if we > could reduce the amount of

Re: [HACKERS] size of .po changesets

2012-08-23 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of jue ago 23 13:33:46 -0400 2012: > Roger Leigh writes: > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:21:35AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > >> Yeah, IMHO .po files are handled pretty badly by SCMs. I wonder if we > >> could reduce the amount of git churn caused by those files

Re: [HACKERS] size of .po changesets

2012-08-23 Thread Tom Lane
Roger Leigh writes: > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:21:35AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> Yeah, IMHO .po files are handled pretty badly by SCMs. I wonder if we >> could reduce the amount of git churn caused by those files by simply >> removing all comment lines from these files as they are exporte

Re: [HACKERS] size of .po changesets

2012-08-23 Thread Roger Leigh
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:21:35AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of jue ago 23 11:01:05 -0400 2012: > > > > > $ git diff --shortstat REL9_0_9 REL9_1_5 > > 3186 files changed, 314847 insertions(+), 210452 deletions(-) > > $ git diff --shortstat REL9_1_5 REL9_2_BE