On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 06:06:05AM -0400, Jan Wieck wrote:
> On 9/17/2004 7:32 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >over time. I'm wondering about DNS lookup results in particular.
>
> Except for one "localhost", one "/tmp/.s.PGSQL..." and the "543x" lookup
> during the postmaster start, all lookups are IP ad
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 07:32:30PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> involve consulting DNS? If so, try to correlate the crash probability
> with changes in your DNS zone contents ...
No changes. The systems in question have no access to DNS.
/etc/hosts only.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | [EMAIL PROTECTED
On 9/17/2004 7:32 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The problem comes and goes. So either I can cause a coredump just on the
snap by running a shellscript that does 100 psql -c "select version()"
calls, or it is next to impossible to crash it at all.
Hmm, that's really biz
Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The problem comes and goes. So either I can cause a coredump just on the
> snap by running a shellscript that does 100 psql -c "select version()"
> calls, or it is next to impossible to crash it at all.
Hmm, that's really bizarre. It seems like the only s
On 4/19/2004 1:18 PM, Jan Wieck wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 07:52:59PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
I can see from your trace that you are using the getaddrinfo code from
libc, but where is configure finding a header that declares struct
addr
Quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Momjian):
> Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 01:12:10PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>
>> > Well, the bad news is that this backtrace isn't very useful.
>>
>> No kidding. It's pretty frustrating.
>>
>> > My only guess is that getaddrinfo in your
On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 06:06:12PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> When you say "init" directory, what do you mean? /bin?
No. The place where the init scripts (which cause postgres to start)
live.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the future this spectacle of the middle classes sh
> > My only guess is that getaddrinfo in your libc has a bug somehow that is
> > corrupting the stack (hance the improper backtrace), then crashing.
>
> It could be libc on AIX, I suppose, but it strikes me as sort of odd
> that nobody else ever seens this. Unless nobody else is using AIX
> 5.1,
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 01:12:10PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Well, the bad news is that this backtrace isn't very useful.
>
> No kidding. It's pretty frustrating.
>
> > My only guess is that getaddrinfo in your libc has a bug somehow that is
> > corrupting the
On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 01:12:10PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Well, the bad news is that this backtrace isn't very useful.
No kidding. It's pretty frustrating.
> My only guess is that getaddrinfo in your libc has a bug somehow that is
> corrupting the stack (hance the improper backtrace),
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 11:59:40AM -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> >
> > On the weekend, we ran a set of tests on the offending system to see
> > if we could re-create it. We set up the triggering conditions just
> > as they'd been when it happened, and alas, no segfault.
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 11:59:40AM -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>
> On the weekend, we ran a set of tests on the offending system to see
> if we could re-create it. We set up the triggering conditions just
> as they'd been when it happened, and alas, no segfault. So although
> this was pretty m
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 03:56:55PM -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 03:19:21PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > Has this been resolved?
> it elsewhere. I've been trying some alternative approaches to
> causing it today, and so far no luck.
On the weekend, we ran a set
On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 03:19:21PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Has this been resolved?
Not as far as I know. Unfortunately, the problem happened in an
environment I Can't Play With, and I haven't been able to reproduce
it elsewhere. I've been trying some alternative approaches to
causing it
Has this been resolved?
---
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 11:18:07AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > What you'd need to do is determine which system headers are being
> > #include'd by that config test, an
On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 11:18:07AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> What you'd need to do is determine which system headers are being
> #include'd by that config test, and then look through them to find
> struct addrinfo.
Well, I have this in /usr/include/netdb.h:
struct addrinfo {
int
Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 07:52:59PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
I can see from your trace that you are using the getaddrinfo code from
libc, but where is configure finding a header that declares struct
addrinfo?
Hrm, I can't seem to tell. I s
On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 11:18:07AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> A shortcut is just to grep through /usr/include and its subdirectories
> for addrinfo. If you only find one definition, then you don't really
> need to worry too much. But if there's more than one you need to
> determine which is gettin
Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 07:52:59PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I can see from your trace that you are using the getaddrinfo code from
>> libc, but where is configure finding a header that declares struct
>> addrinfo?
> Hrm, I can't seem to tell. I see t
(Sorry, had a mail problem here this weekend.)
On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 07:52:59PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> I can see from your trace that you are using the getaddrinfo code from
> libc, but where is configure finding a header that declares struct
> addrinfo?
Hrm, I can't seem to tell. I see t
Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We've had a backend crash with sig 11 during connection. My guess is
> there's something up with (maybe) the IPv6 support on AIX.
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0xd01d7778 in memmove () from /usr/lib/libc.a(shr.o)
> #1 0xd0326e1c in getaddrinfo2 () from /usr/lib/l
On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 01:07:33PM -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> We've had a backend crash with sig 11 during connection.
By the way, I failed to mention, but sig 11 is segfault on AIX.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)-
22 matches
Mail list logo
