Is this a TODO item?
---
Greg Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jun 2008, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Well, the stuff included into the dump by pg_dump -v is informative,
> > too. But we stopped doing that by default because of complaint
Robert Treat wrote:
If you are calling pg_dump with different flags, it seems likely your breaking
diff equality anyway so I'm not sure how valid that is.
What about different users? Different connection options will result in
the same file but it breaks diff-dump tools. I don't see the point o
On Tue, 3 Jun 2008, Tom Lane wrote:
Well, the stuff included into the dump by pg_dump -v is informative,
too. But we stopped doing that by default because of complaints.
I remain unconvinced that this proposal won't suffer the same fate.
I think it would be reasonable to only include the list
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 02:06:57PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Robert,
>
> > Anyone see any issues with this? Should there be other information taken
> > into account? Does this need to be an option itself, or can we just do
> > it in all cases?
>
> +1 to do it in all cases.
+1. I've definitely
James William Pye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 01:17:43AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> but mainly I don't see the point.
> It's informative, no?
Well, the stuff included into the dump by pg_dump -v is informative,
too. But we stopped doing that by default because of complai
On Tuesday 03 June 2008 01:17:43 Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Anyone see any issues with this?
> I'm a bit worried about breaking diff-equality of matching dumps,
If you are calling pg_dump with different flags, it seems likely your breaking
diff equality anyway
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 01:17:43AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I would like to add the flags given to pg_dump into the output of the
> > pg_dump
> > file.
+1, FWIW
> > Anyone see any issues with this?
>
> I'm a bit worried about breaking diff-equality o
Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would like to add the flags given to pg_dump into the output of the pg_dump
> file.
Why? What is the value of this added complication?
> Anyone see any issues with this?
I'm a bit worried about breaking diff-equality of matching dumps, but
mainly I d
Robert,
> Anyone see any issues with this? Should there be other information taken
> into account? Does this need to be an option itself, or can we just do
> it in all cases?
+1 to do it in all cases.
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
