On 01/13/2012 02:50 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 01/13/2012 12:31 AM, Hitoshi Harada wrote:
So my conclusion is it's better than nothing, but we could do
better job here.
From timeline perspective, it'd be ok to apply this patch and improve
more later in 9.3+.
I agree, let's look at
On 01/13/2012 12:31 AM, Hitoshi Harada wrote:
So my conclusion is it's better than nothing, but we could do better
job here.
From timeline perspective, it'd be ok to apply this patch and improve
more later in 9.3+.
I agree, let's look at the items other than the target list during 9.3.
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Updated, with docs and tests. Since the docs mark the versions of
> pg_get_viewdef() that take text as the first param as deprecated, I removed
> that variant of the new flavor. I left adding extra psql support to another
> day - I think
On 12/22/2011 06:14 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 12/22/2011 06:11 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 12/22/2011 02:17 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 12/22/2011 01:05 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Maybe, though I fear it might complicate the ruleutils code a bit.
You'd probably have to build the output f
On 12/24/2011 02:26 PM, Greg Stark wrote:
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I've looked at that, and it was discussed a bit previously. It's more
complex because it requires that we keep track of (or calculate) where we
are on the line,
You might try a compromise, just s
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I've looked at that, and it was discussed a bit previously. It's more
> complex because it requires that we keep track of (or calculate) where we
> are on the line,
You might try a compromise, just spit out all the columns on one line
*unle
Robert Haas writes:
> I *still* spend a lot of time editing in a 25x80 window.
80 is a good choice whatever the screen size, because it's about the
most efficient text width as far as eyes movements are concerned: the
eye is much better at going top-bottom than left-right. That's also why
print
On 12/22/2011 06:11 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 12/22/2011 02:17 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 12/22/2011 01:05 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Maybe, though I fear it might complicate the ruleutils code a bit.
You'd probably have to build the output for a column first and then
see how long it is bef
On 12/22/2011 02:17 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 12/22/2011 01:05 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Maybe, though I fear it might complicate the ruleutils code a bit.
You'd probably have to build the output for a column first and then
see how long it is before deciding whether to insert a newline.
In sho
On 12/22/2011 01:05 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Haas writes:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
The simple solution I originally proposed to put a line feed and some space
before every target field in pretty print mode. This is a two line patch.
The downsides are a) maybe
Robert Haas writes:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> The simple solution I originally proposed to put a line feed and some space
>> before every target field in pretty print mode. This is a two line patch.
>> The downsides are a) maybe not everyone will like the change
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I used to try to be conservative about vertical space, but in these days of
> scrollbars and screens not limited to 24 or 25 lines (Yes, kids, that's what
> some of us grew up with) that seems a bit old-fashioned. One of the
> arguments for
On 12/22/2011 12:52 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 12/22/2011 12:18 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Andrew Dunstan
wrote:
The simple solution I originally proposed to put a line feed and
some space
before every target field in pretty print mode. This is a two line
pa
On 12/22/2011 12:18 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
The simple solution I originally proposed to put a line feed and some space
before every target field in pretty print mode. This is a two line patch.
The downsides are a) maybe not everyone will
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> The simple solution I originally proposed to put a line feed and some space
> before every target field in pretty print mode. This is a two line patch.
> The downsides are a) maybe not everyone will like the change and b) it will
> produce s
15 matches
Mail list logo
