2010/3/11 KaiGai Kohei :
> (2010/03/11 23:55), Robert Haas wrote:
>> 2010/3/10 KaiGai Kohei:
>>> Indeed, it is useful to allow renaming attribute of composite types.
>>>
>>> However, it is also useless to allow to rename attribute of sequences,
>>> but harmless, like renames on indexes. It seems to
(2010/03/11 23:55), Robert Haas wrote:
> 2010/3/10 KaiGai Kohei:
>> Indeed, it is useful to allow renaming attribute of composite types.
>>
>> However, it is also useless to allow to rename attribute of sequences,
>> but harmless, like renames on indexes. It seems to me it is fair enough
>> to allo
2010/3/10 KaiGai Kohei :
> Indeed, it is useful to allow renaming attribute of composite types.
>
> However, it is also useless to allow to rename attribute of sequences,
> but harmless, like renames on indexes. It seems to me it is fair enough
> to allow renaming attributes of tables, views and co
(2010/03/11 0:54), Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> 2010/3/3 KaiGai Kohei:
>>> (2010/03/03 22:42), Robert Haas wrote:
2010/3/3 KaiGai Kohei:
> (2010/03/03 14:26), Robert Haas wrote:
>> 2010/3/2 KaiGai Kohei:
>>> Is it an expected behavior?
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> 2010/3/3 KaiGai Kohei :
>> (2010/03/03 22:42), Robert Haas wrote:
>>> 2010/3/3 KaiGai Kohei:
(2010/03/03 14:26), Robert Haas wrote:
> 2010/3/2 KaiGai Kohei:
>> Is it an expected behavior?
>>
>> postgres=> CREATE SEQUEN
2010/3/3 KaiGai Kohei :
> (2010/03/03 22:42), Robert Haas wrote:
>> 2010/3/3 KaiGai Kohei:
>>> (2010/03/03 14:26), Robert Haas wrote:
2010/3/2 KaiGai Kohei:
> Is it an expected behavior?
>
> postgres=> CREATE SEQUENCE s;
> CREATE SEQUENCE
> postgres=> ALTER T
(2010/03/03 22:42), Robert Haas wrote:
> 2010/3/3 KaiGai Kohei:
>> (2010/03/03 14:26), Robert Haas wrote:
>>> 2010/3/2 KaiGai Kohei:
Is it an expected behavior?
postgres=>CREATE SEQUENCE s;
CREATE SEQUENCE
postgres=>ALTER TABLE s RENAME sequence_name TO abc
2010/3/3 KaiGai Kohei :
> (2010/03/03 14:26), Robert Haas wrote:
>> 2010/3/2 KaiGai Kohei:
>>> Is it an expected behavior?
>>>
>>> postgres=> CREATE SEQUENCE s;
>>> CREATE SEQUENCE
>>> postgres=> ALTER TABLE s RENAME sequence_name TO abcd;
>>> ALTER TABLE
>>>
>>> postgres=> CREATE TABL
Hi,
KaiGai Kohei írta:
> (2010/03/03 14:26), Robert Haas wrote:
>
>> 2010/3/2 KaiGai Kohei:
>>
>>> Is it an expected behavior?
>>>
>>> postgres=> CREATE SEQUENCE s;
>>> CREATE SEQUENCE
>>> postgres=> ALTER TABLE s RENAME sequence_name TO abcd;
>>> ALTER TABLE
>>>
>>> postgres=>
(2010/03/03 14:26), Robert Haas wrote:
> 2010/3/2 KaiGai Kohei:
>> Is it an expected behavior?
>>
>> postgres=> CREATE SEQUENCE s;
>> CREATE SEQUENCE
>> postgres=> ALTER TABLE s RENAME sequence_name TO abcd;
>> ALTER TABLE
>>
>> postgres=> CREATE TABLE t (a int primary key, b text);
>>
2010/3/2 KaiGai Kohei :
> Is it an expected behavior?
>
> postgres=> CREATE SEQUENCE s;
> CREATE SEQUENCE
> postgres=> ALTER TABLE s RENAME sequence_name TO abcd;
> ALTER TABLE
>
> postgres=> CREATE TABLE t (a int primary key, b text);
> NOTICE: CREATE TABLE / PRIMARY KEY will create implici
(2010/03/03 11:22), Tom Lane wrote:
> KaiGai Kohei writes:
>> Is it an expected behavior?
>
> There's no particular reason to forbid it, is there?
Perhaps, it is harmless.
It just seemed to me the renameatt() was not implemented correctly
according to the documentation.
--
KaiGai Kohei
--
S
KaiGai Kohei writes:
> Is it an expected behavior?
There's no particular reason to forbid it, is there?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql
13 matches
Mail list logo
