Andy Colson writes:
> This patch:
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=597
> caches the cache because, I guess, the cache is slow.
> Simon asked, "What is making the first cache so slow?". Pavel does not know,
> nor how to fix it, and nobody else responded.
Well, the cache
Hello
2011/9/5 Andy Colson :
> Pavel, I have not taken on your patch for review, but I was reading the
> history of it, and one question popped up:
>
> If you are allocating a new cache, what if the array is really big, will 1st
> cache + your cache get bigger than work_mem? (or are array op's no
Hello
2011/9/5 Andy Colson :
> This patch:
>
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=597
>
> caches the cache because, I guess, the cache is slow.
>
> Simon asked, "What is making the first cache so slow?". Pavel does not
> know, nor how to fix it, and nobody else responded.
>
>
Pavel, I have not taken on your patch for review, but I was reading the history
of it, and one question popped up:
If you are allocating a new cache, what if the array is really big, will 1st
cache + your cache get bigger than work_mem? (or are array op's not
constrained by work_mem? Sorry,
