Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2014-02-14 13:33:46 -0500, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > On 02/14/2014 01:11 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 2014-02-14 13:08:34 -0500, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > >> Do the 9.3.3 replication fixes mean that users should reclone their
> > >> replicas, like 9.3.2 did
On 2014-02-14 13:33:46 -0500, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 02/14/2014 01:11 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 2014-02-14 13:08:34 -0500, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >> Do the 9.3.3 replication fixes mean that users should reclone their
> >> replicas, like 9.3.2 did? Or not?
> >
> > Which replicati
On 02/14/2014 01:11 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2014-02-14 13:08:34 -0500, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Do the 9.3.3 replication fixes mean that users should reclone their
>> replicas, like 9.3.2 did? Or not?
>
> Which replication replication fixes are you referring to?
> http://git.postgresq
Hi,
On 2014-02-14 13:08:34 -0500, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Do the 9.3.3 replication fixes mean that users should reclone their
> replicas, like 9.3.2 did? Or not?
Which replication replication fixes are you referring to?
http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=ebde6c40148c9f811
All,
Do the 9.3.3 replication fixes mean that users should reclone their
replicas, like 9.3.2 did? Or not?
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgr
Greg Stark writes:
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 10:55 PM, Sean Chittenden wrote:
>> Are there any tentative plans for the 9.3.3 release date? 9.3.2 was released
>> in December and it's getting close to the two month mark for another micro
>> release, or at least one seems like one should be right a
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 10:55 PM, Sean Chittenden wrote:
> Are there any tentative plans for the 9.3.3 release date? 9.3.2 was released
> in December and it's getting close to the two month mark for another micro
> release, or at least one seems like one should be right around the corner.
Bug f
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 12:23:59AM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> You usually post a list of Open Items during Beta ... other then that, end
> of the week sounds cool to me ...
One important item on that list is "add documentation for autovacuum."
I'll try to come up with something before be
You usually post a list of Open Items during Beta ... other then that, end
of the week sounds cool to me ...
On Mon, 5 Sep 2005, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Beta1 has gone very well so far. There have been very few bug reports,
though I know that many people are testing it because it is mentioned
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Perhaps we should start thinking about Beta2.
There are some open items with roles and triggers that would be nice
to fix first, but I agree beta2 should be soon. End of the week or so,
maybe?
regards, tom lane
---(end o
Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Peter has is thinking of freezing error message strings next week so
>> others can start on translations, and we should start collecting port
>> reports after the next beta too.
> Is there a doc freeze as well as the error message string freeze?
No, we n
On Sat, 2004-11-06 at 04:38, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> In talking to people working on various items, I think we should plan
> for a beta next week once we have completed all the major open 8.0
> items. Only the tablespace and win32 lost signals seem major.
>
> And, once the beta has been tested for
12 matches
Mail list logo
